![]() |
|
|||||||
| Crassulaceae Open Discussion of species such as Aeonium, Cotyledon, Crassula, Dudleya, Echeveria, Graptopetalum, Kalanchoe, Pachyphytum, Sedum, Sempervivum and other members of the Crassulaceae group |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
In researching my little green-bean Cotyledon sp.,
Cotyledon ID help? green-bean leaves, orangish-red bell-form flowersI found this paper containing a nice table of the five Cotyledon orbiculata varieties recognized at that time: http://www.amjbot.org/content/vol92/...-07-08-f01.gif Mort, Mark E., Levsen, Nicholas, Randle, Christopher P., Van Jaarsveld, Ernst, Palmer, AnnieAnd citing Mort et al. 2005, Google Scholar took me to this very, very interesting-looking paper (Gontcharova, Gontcharov 2009), which I am now dying to read: S. B. Gontcharova and A. A. GontcharovAny Xeric World folks fluent in academese taken a look at this? Lend me a copy? Pretty please? ;-) Utterly fascinating. They seem to call for a serious reorganization of Cotyledon (Mort et al. 2005) and all of Crassulaceae (Gontcharova, Gontcharov 2009). I guess this is commonplace now throughout the tree of life as genetic data pours in to revise the divisions by form and location. But still amazing to me to see this science occuring before our very eyes -- even with the chaos that causes. Life is chaotic. --dean sentientmeat.net |
| The Following User Says Thank You to amanzed For This Useful Post: | ||
Allen Repashy (08-23-2010) | ||
|
||||
|
Ah! yes, of course. My thoughts exactly. In fact, they might even have it at Occidental College, where my husband teaches.
This time I was just fishing for a way to avoid a trip to the library. I love libraries, but time flows differently there. I enter, and after a few minutes inside, I exit again. Meanwhile on the outside, whole days have passed. My plants are dry, my dogs no longer recognize me, and one of my fish has died. --dean |
|
||||
|
To follow up, Gontcharova and Gontcharov (2009) is now available for free download. (Maybe they held it back for only a year after English publication.)
Unfortunately it seems to be a survey of recent work (apropos of this thread, it refers to Mort et al.) It didn't have groundbreaking new genetic surveys. It calls for new family trees for CRASSULACEAE, but does not propose them. Still, it's a nice starting place to study the state of the picture from work during the last 10 years. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
