![]() |
|
|||||||
| Soil and Supplementation Open discussion of soil mixes, supplements, enrichments, fertilizers...fertigation... materials and methods. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
I tend to use a lower N and higher P and K. Too much N can lead to soft growth that is more susceptible to disease. Don't forget micronutrients, they are very important for good plant growth. The ppm will vary with the frequency of fertilizing.
Greg |
| The Following User Says Thank You to agavegreg For This Useful Post: | ||
Allen Repashy (09-09-2009) | ||
|
||||
|
Hello Greg,
Thanks for the input. I am trying to make it easy and feed on a continuous basis through the watering system other than during a few months of winter when it is cold and there isn't active growth. probably December-February for my climate here..... which is when we get most of our rains anyway... My preliminary research is coming up with a range of 100-200ppm for this kind of regiment. Allen |
|
||||
|
Optimal fertilization schemes will vary with the time of year also. I use higher N in the spring and early summer moving to more K in the fall, particularly for plants that are producing a lot of seed.
T |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Tim Harvey For This Useful Post: | ||
Allen Repashy (09-09-2009) | ||
|
||||
|
Is that 100-200ppm range expressed in terms of nitrogen? I would rarely exceed 200ppm N for aloes and agaves even during what's called pulse feeding For constant feed, closer to 150 sounds reasonable. I agree with everyone on the low nitrogen. The only time I may use a balanced N-P-K ratio is for pumping-up seedlings, or like Tim said, early in the season. For finishing and flowering, I recommend that the potassium (K) be at least twice as high as the nitrogen. Phosphorus should be disproportionately high as well. I've found that too much N can exacerbate potassium deficiency. High calcium is important for limestone species.
Your rate and frequency will depend on whether you use soil or soil-less growing media. Lower rate constant feed is geared more towards soil-less media. Also, have your water tested or obtain a water quality report to view nutrients already present in the water. Matt |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Matt Maggio For This Useful Post: | ||
Allen Repashy (09-09-2009) | ||
|
||||
|
Hi Matt,
I browsed the Grow More selection and found a couple of formulas that seem to fit the discussion. http://www.growmore.com/formulas/122626.pdf And I found an interesting formula of theirs on another site: http://www.ezfloinjection.com/pdfs/MSDS102030GM.pdf The majority of the Nitrogen is in the Nitrate form.. Dylan Hannon was using a Grow More Hydroponic formula for growing bulbs and other types of 5-11-26 but I can't find the breakdown on this one. I think this is the same product....... http://www.hydro-gardens.com/51126.htm What do you guys think of these? |
|
||||
|
In this discussion, the big issue with any fertilizer is whether one can make a concentrated enough solution to use with an injector.
They say use 2-4 lbs/100 gallons. For an injector diluting 1:50 you would need to dissolve 1-2 lbs in a gallon for use as a stock solution. That can be the tricky bit. It might be that soluble, I don't know since I've never used it. T |
|
||||
|
It says it is soluble "up to 4 pounds per gallon"... meaning on a really hot day
![]() But according the the 10-20-30 spec sheet I linked to, they say that to have 100 ppm N, you only need 11 ounces for a 1:100 Injector ratio. Not sure on the hydro formula, I haven't figured out how to do the math myself! |
|
||||
|
Ok.
Since we're getting technical, here's a sample calculation working with Grow More 10-20-30, where the ultimate goal is figuring out how much fertilizer to add to your stock solution(prior to injection) to achieve a desired PPM nitrogen in the FINISH solution, given a certain proportioner rate - existing tapwater N aside. Yes, I know Dosatron has an online calculator, but who cares ![]() Say you want 100 PPM nitrogen in your FINISHED solution for a constant feed program, and the proportioner is set to a 1:50 ratio. First, use that desired PPM N to find the amount of N present in 100 gallons of finish solution. Let's express everything in ounces by weight. 1 gal = 8.34lbs, So 8.34 x 16oz./lb = 133.44oz./gal, x 100gals. = 13,344oz. 100 gallons weighs 13,344oz. so use the following proportion: If: 100oz. N 1,000,000oz. H20 Then: x oz. N 13,344oz. H20 1,000,000x = 1,334,400 x = 1.334oz. N in 100gals. at 100PPM nitrogen That's just nitrogen. We need to know how much fertilizer is in 100 gal, So: Since 10-20-30 has 10%N, divide 1.334oz by 0.10 to get 13.34 oz. fertilizer in 100 gal To get the amount of fert. for preparation of the stock solution, bear in mind that a 1:50 ratio means that 1 gal stock solution gets proportioned for every 50 gal water, producing 51 gal finished solution. If: 13.34oz. fert 100 gals. finished Then: x oz. fert 51 gal finished x = 6.80 oz. fert. in 51 gal finished solution So, if 1 gal stock solution gets removed from the tank to make 51 gal finished solution, then you must dilute 6.80oz. of fert. for every gallon of stock solution. Summary: 6.80oz. of 10-20-30/ gallon stock solution will produce a 100 PPM nitrogen finished solution, when proportioned at 1:50. Make sense? I looked at those formulas above. The NPK looks pretty good but notice there's no calcium or magnesium in the Grow More stuff. That's probably for incompatibility reasons with respects to phosphate. You may have close to enough Ca in the tap already for most crops, I'm not too sure for Mg You may have to supply these separately in space and/or time in conjunction with phosphate fertilizers or phosphoric acid - I'm tying threads into knots.Here's a useful link for fertiigation IBT - Three Reasons to Broaden Your Fertigation Knowledge Here's another good brand of fertilizer. Check out their CalMag Special for possible supplemental use.http://www.plantmarvel.com Matt Last edited by Matt Maggio; 09-17-2009 at 02:14 AM. Reason: gallon weight was off |
|
||||
|
You've got me curious Tim. I learned on one of those brass siphons, 1:16 being most common. I was told that this is a concentrate to water ratio, and that the extra gallon must be factored in. I know brass siphons aren't in the same category as other injectors, but why would they be rated in the same fashion? If that's true, then substitute 50 for 51 to get about 6.8 oz for the above problem.
Matt |
|
||||
|
It is confusing. 1:16 really means 1 arbitrary volume made up to 16 x that volume by the addition of 15 volume equivalents of some other material. Using that terminology can get ambiguous though, since a 50% dilution is 1:1 ...
T |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
